Clean Energy is Killing Americans!

February 18, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / 1 Comment

(Killing them at a rate that is a tiny fraction of the deaths related to fossil fuel and environmental pollution.)

Having wreaked havoc in international relations, set the global economy into a tailspin, and chipped away at the Constitution, Mr. Trump set his sights on a new project, the environment and clean energy.

By effectively emasculating the EPA and withdrawing from international agreements decades in the making, Trump has now set climate policy, perhaps eliminating any opportunity to slow global warming, back fifty years.

Well, he must be trying to protect American lives and the American way, right? Clean energy and all these EPA regulations must be harming Americans.

Let’s see.

Deaths Attributable to Clean Energy Sources in the United States

How many deaths are attributable to clean energy sources (such as wind, solar, hydro, and nuclear) in the U.S.

Based on the web‑retrieved scientific datasets, the key point is:

Clean energy sources cause extremely few deaths—effectively near zero—compared with fossil fuels.

1. Mortality Rates per Unit of Electricity (Global Data, Applicable to U.S.)

The leading scientific compilations provide death rates per terawatt‑hour (TWh) of electricity. These include deaths from both accidents and air pollution.

Clean Energy (Low‑Carbon Sources)

From Our World in Data (Markandya & Wilkinson; Sovacool et al.; UNSCEAR):

Solar: ~0.02 deaths per TWh
Wind: ~0.04 deaths per TWh
Hydropower: ~1.3 deaths per TWh (higher largely due to rare but catastrophic dam failures, not routine operation)
Nuclear: ~0.03 deaths per TWh (even including Chernobyl and Fukushima)

These figures are extremely low compared with fossil fuels.

And before anyone starts talking about the birds being killed by wind power (because we know supporters of fossil fuels care greatly for these creatures) U.S. estimates typically range from hundreds of thousands to around one million birds per year killed by wind turbines, depending on methodology and turbine growth.

Wind turbines kill far fewer birds than buildings, windows, power lines, or domestic cats, which together account for hundreds of millions to billions of bird deaths annually in the U.S.

Maybe we should get rid of cats?

Fossil Fuels (for contrast)

From Statista’s global mortality dataset:

Coal: ~25–33 deaths per TWh
Oil: much higher than renewables
Biomass: also significantly higher

This demonstrates that clean energy technologies are among the safest ever used.

2. What This Means for the U.S. Specifically

Although the datasets are global, they apply directly to the U.S. because:

The physical risk mechanisms (air pollution, accidents, radiation, turbine failures) are the same.
U.S. regulatory standards are among the strictest in the world, which further reduces clean‑energy mortality below global averages.

Estimated U.S. Deaths from Clean Energy

Because the mortality rates are so low, and U.S. generation volumes are known, we can characterize the effects qualitatively:

Wind, solar, nuclear:
Deaths are effectively near zero per year.
Any deaths would come from rare installation/maintenance accidents, not pollution.
Hydropower:
Also extremely low.
There have been no large‑scale U.S. dam‑failure mass‑casualty events in the modern clean‑energy era.

Context: Fossil‑fuel deaths in the U.S.

Just for comparison, fossil‑fuel air pollution still causes over 50,000 U.S. deaths annually.

So clean energy saves lives by displacing far more dangerous energy sources.

3. Plain‑Language Summary

Clean energy sources (wind, solar, nuclear, hydropower) cause almost no deaths in the U.S.
Their mortality rates are 100–1000× lower than fossil fuels.
Most U.S. energy‑related deaths result from air pollution from fossil fuels—not from clean energy.

Deaths attributable to rising air and water pollution from 1950–2025.

Summary of What the Data Shows (1950–2025)

1. Long‑term trend: Pollution‑related deaths have risen significantly

The earliest comprehensive global datasets begin around 1990, not 1950. However, historical research consistently shows:

Industrialization in the mid‑20th century sharply increased pollution exposure.
From 1990 to 2023, global deaths attributable specifically to air pollution increased from 5.99 million to 7.9 million annually.1
This represents roughly a 32% increase over three decades.

Water pollution–attributable deaths are less consistently tracked in the modern datasets, but WHO and IHME place diarrheal and sanitation-linked mortality at over 1.4–1.7 million deaths per year globally in recent decades (not included in most “air pollution” datasets).
Note: No quantitative 1950–1989 global mortality databases exist for combined air + water pollution.

2. Air Pollution Mortality (Modern Detailed Data: 1990–2025)

Current annual burden (2023 estimates)

7.9 million deaths attributable to air pollution worldwide in 2023.
– Primarily from heart disease, stroke, respiratory diseases, diabetes, cancer.1
86% (6.8 million) were from noncommunicable diseases.1
600,000+ deaths linked to dementia for the first time (reported in 2025).1

Exposure trends

36% of the world’s population still exposed to PM2.5 above WHO’s least stringent target.2
2.6 billion people exposed to household air pollution from solid fuels.2

Global share of total deaths

Air pollution contributes to one in ten deaths globally each year.3

3. Water Pollution Mortality

While the search did not surface a unified “air + water pollution” mortality series, WHO’s water/sanitation data (not in the retrieved sources) typically shows:

Approximately 1.4–1.7 million annual deaths in recent decades from unsafe water, sanitation, and hygiene.

The datasets for water pollution rarely extend reliably back to mid‑century (1950s–1970s).
However, historical global mortality from contaminated water was substantially higher in 1950 and has declined due to sanitation improvements.

4. Combining Air + Water Pollution (1950–2025): What We Can Say with Confidence

Because only air‑pollution mortality is tracked with consistency over time:

1950–1990 (qualitative historical trajectory)

Both air and water pollution deaths were significantly higher than today in the Global South and rapidly industrializing regions.
Air pollution deaths increased through mid‑20th‑century industrial growth.
Water‑pollution deaths were far higher pre‑1970s due to lack of water treatment and sanitation.

1990–2025 (quantitative era)

Air pollution deaths increased from ~6 million to nearly 8 million per year (≈+32%).1
Water‑related deaths have gradually decreased due to sanitation improvements, though precise annual global series was not found in retrieved sources.

Comparison of Deaths from Air vs. Water Pollution (1990–2025)

1. Air Pollution Deaths (1990–2025)

Modern data on global air‑pollution mortality is extensive.

Key findings

Air pollution contributes to millions of premature deaths annually.
Deaths from air pollution have increased by more than 10% since 1990.
In 2023, air pollution was responsible for 7.9 million deaths globally (from the State of Global Air dataset covering trends from 1990 to 2023).

Trend summary

From 1990 → 2023:

Increase in global air‑pollution deaths.
Air pollution remains one of the world’s leading risk factors for death, accounting for 1 in 10 global deaths.

2. Water Pollution Deaths (1990–2025)

Unlike air pollution, the web search did not return any global, long‑term datasets on water‑pollution mortality for 1990–2025.

This absence is expected—global water‑pollution death figures are usually embedded within:

“Unsafe water, sanitation, and hygiene” categories (WHO/GBD),
Focused on diarrheal disease,
And not presented in long‑term trend datasets like air‑pollution deaths.

What we know (contextual, but not from retrieved sources)

Unsafe water typically contributes to 1.4–1.7 million deaths per year globally (WHO/GBD).
Long‑term trend: declining since the 1990s due to improved sanitation and water treatment—but this was not present in the tool‑retrieved data, so cannot be cited directly.

3. Direct Comparison (Based on Search‑Retrieved Data)

Air Pollution

Robust 1990–2023 trend data available.
Deaths rose from ~6 million to ~8 million per year.
3 2

Water Pollution

No long‑term datasets were returned by the search.
No 1990–2025 death series available in tool‑retrieved sources.

Conclusion

Air‑pollution deaths increased significantly from 1990 to 2025.
Water‑pollution deaths cannot be quantitatively trended from the available sources, as no data was returned.
Based on global patterns (non‑cited), water‑related deaths likely declined, while air‑pollution deaths rose.

Walking Past History

February 12, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

We have the pleasure of hosting our grandsons at, as they call it, “Grandmother and Grandfather’s hotel,” a couple of days a week here in Warren in the old American Tourister Mill. Both kids, aged 2 and 4, love exploring the halls looking for pirates and ghosts (which, they insist, are quite common, albeit hard to catch. But they have seen them!)

While wandering the halls, I had occasion to wonder about the many pictures on display. So, as I am want to do, I took pictures of the pictures and, through the magic of AI and Google Image search, I did some digging into their origin.

For some, I was only able to get generic references but for others, there is a well documented history behind them. Several of the images were taken by a man named Lewis Hines in the late 19th and early 20th century.

Here is the Wikipedia listing for him.

Lewis Wickes Hine (September 26, 1874 – November 3, 1940) was an American sociologist and muckraker photographer. His photographs taken during times such as the Progressive Era and the Great Depression captured young children working in harsh conditions, playing a role in bringing about the passage of the first child labor laws in the United States.

If you’re interested in more there is quite a bit of background on the child labor law saga and images taken by Hines to illustrate the horrors of the times.

But for now, I just wanted to give you a flavor of these images on display and, perhaps, incite an interest in admiring the history

Between 1876 and 1924, Greenville’s best defense against fire was this antique hand-pumper affectionately named the “Water Witch”. It took quite a few men, and a lot of stamina to operate it. (Photo courtesy of Priscilla W. Holt.)

Image accompanied a story posted in the Smith-Appleby House Museum Website about the The Great Greenville Conflagration of 1924. It was an intense blaze that broke out on a cold winter’s night in the very heart of Greenville, at an hour when most citizens were snug in their beds. When it was over, two prominent landmarks had been destroyed, six businesses and the post office were gone, and three families were left homeless. Had it not been for the brave efforts of volunteer firefighters, it could have been much worse.

This vintage photograph captures a group of young workers, likely child laborers, posing in front of a building in the early 20th century.

The image is part of a collection documenting industrial child labor conditions in the United States.
Similar photographs from this period, such as those taken by Lewis Hine in 1911, depict young boys and girls working in textile mills, factories, and other industrial facilities.

The clothing style, including caps and jackets, suggests a late 19th or early 20th-century time period.
The sepia-toned photograph shows several children gathered around, likely engaged in a game involving items on the ground.

This image depicts an early classroom at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD).

Historical Context

The photograph likely dates back to the early years of the institution, which was founded in 1877. RISD was established by Helen Metcalf and her women’s group, the Rhode Island Women’s Centennial Commission.

Photograph Title: Newsboys Smoking, 1910.
Photographer: Taken by Lewis Hine on May 9, 1910, while working for the National Child Labor Committee (NCLC).
Subject: The photograph shows young boys known as “newsies,” who sold newspapers on the streets, posing while smoking cigarettes.
Location: The scene was shot at Skeeter’s Branch in St. Louis, Missouri.

Interesting when you consider these boys likely ended in the military during World War I.

This image captures a historical moment featuring the North Warren Consolidated Railroad Station.

The photograph depicts a group of children or young adults posing in front of the rustic station building.
The station served as a critical hub for local transportation and commerce in the early 20th century.
Small-town depots like this were central meeting places for community members before the prevalence of automobiles.

This image captures a moment in time featuring children playing a game known as “pitching pennies” on a city sidewalk.

Photographer: The photograph was taken by Lewis Wickes Hine in November 1912.
Location: The scene was recorded in Providence, Rhode Island.
Context: Hine took this photograph while working for the National Child Labor Committee to document working and living conditions for children at the time.
The Game: Pitching pennies is an ancient game where players toss coins toward a wall, with the goal of landing their coin closest to it to win.

This image depicts an early 20th-century newspaper printing office, likely dating from the 1900s to the 1920s, showcasing the traditional letterpress printing process.

Typesetting Areas: Workers are positioned at large slanted desks known as composing sticks or type cases, where they would manually arrange individual metal letters (type) to form sentences and paragraphs.
Printing Press: In the background, heavy machinery, likely a flatbed or cylinder press, is visible, which was used to transfer ink from the type onto paper.
Manual Labor: The scene highlights a labor-intensive environment required for printing daily news before modern digital technology existed.
Historical Significance: Such offices were central hubs in local communities, producing newspapers like The Eagle in Montana or the Stuttgart Germania in Arkansas.

This vintage photograph captures a historic train scene featuring a New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad locomotive, specifically numbered 76.

The image shows a classic 4-4-0 “American” type steam locomotive, which was the dominant passenger engine type in the United States during the mid-to-late 19th century.
Two railroad employees are posing beside the engine, providing a sense of scale and highlighting the manual labor involved in early railroading.
The locomotive tender is clearly marked with “NYNH&H,” identifying the railroad company.
This photograph serves as a visual record of late 19th-century railway technology and daily operations.

This photograph depicts an early trolley car operating in Rhode Island, likely near the turn of the 20th century, which served as a primary form of public transportation in the state.

The trolley is branded for routes to “Warren Ave & Riverside” and likely destined for a park.
It features an open-sided design with transverse seating, typical of summer streetcars of that era.
The men pictured are likely the conductor, motorman, and other transit employees in uniform.
This style of electric streetcar eventually replaced horse-drawn omnibuses that had been operating since the Civil War era.

This vintage photograph, likely from the early 20th century, captures a group of people including women in distinctive period attire and a boy with a dog. Based on visual comparisons, the central woman’s outfit is a striking hobble skirt, a tubular fashion trend characterized by a very narrow hem that “hobbled” the wearer’s gait.

Historical Context and Attire

The Hobble Skirt: This narrow-bottomed skirt was a curious and sometimes scandalous fashion popular between 1908 and 1914. The bold vertical stripes on the central figure’s dress were common in avant-garde designs of that era.
Suffragette Influence: During this period (roughly 1908–1920), women’s fashion was often intertwined with the suffragette movement. While the specific individuals in this image are not identified, many prominent suffragists utilized distinct public costumes for rallies and marches to gain visibility for their cause.
Period Accessories: The other women are seen wearing wide-brimmed hats and structured coats typical of the 1910s and early 1920s. One woman on the left appears to be wearing a sash, a common accessory for activists and participants in formal processions.

This image captures a pivotal moment in American history, specifically related to labor conditions and child labor in the early 20th century.

Photographer & Date: The photograph was taken by Lewis Wickes Hine on June 10, 1909.
Location: The scene is in Warren, Rhode Island, near the Warren Manufacturing Company mill.
Context: The image shows young boys arriving for work at 6:00 AM.
Historical Impact: Hine took this photograph as part of his work for the National Child Labor Committee to document and advocate against the exploitation of children in industrial settings.

So the next time you walk by these images, take a moment to look back in time. You are walking right past history.

Some Things ARE Timeless

February 12, 2026February 12, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

Back when I was in grammar school, where we had to avoid dinosaurs, Neanderthals, and Fingernail Freddy on our way to catch the bus, one of the motivating factors to keep going was the monthly arrival (I seem to recall it came to the school, but I may be making that up) of Highlights Magazine.

Chock full of stories, games, and mind puzzles, it was a significant factor in developing my love of reading. Coupled with the Hardy Boy series, the Encyclopedia Britannica, and a well-equipped (and mostly unrestricted) library, the entire would was within my reach.

And now we want to pass it on to the next generation.

We have continued the tradition with our grandsons, starting with a brand new subscription to Highlights. Some of the other book series have changed. My grandson, Levi, loves the Goosebumps and Garbage Pail Kids series by R.L. Stine. What little boy wouldn’t like scary stories or books with characters named Adam Bomb, Brainy Janey, or Luke Puke?

Like most kids, Levi’s memory is a sponge. He has memorized the titles of almost all 62 Goosebumps books and can recite the plot and characters from many of them.

So, while I also still enjoy some good “hurling” jokes and bathroom humor, we are certain Highlights magazine will offer a more diverse array of stories for him to read and repeat ad nauseum.

Some things truly are timeless.

This Special K isn’t Good for Most

February 11, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

The US is in a K-shaped economy. It is characterized by extreme growth in the high-end sector at the expense and detriment of the lower and medium wage sector. While many sing the praises of this administration’s economic policy (if one could even describe what that policy is) the reality for most Americans is not a positive economic outlook.

A K‑shaped economy describes a recovery or growth pattern where different parts of the population experience sharply different outcomes simultaneously. One group’s economic prospects rise (the upward arm of the “K”), while another group’s prospects fall or stagnate (the downward arm). This term became common during and after the COVID‑19 pandemic to explain uneven economic recovery.

Effects on lower‑income Americans

Lower‑income Americans are typically on the downward side of the “K” and face several challenges:

Job insecurity: Many lower‑wage jobs are concentrated in service, retail, hospitality, and gig work, which are more vulnerable to layoffs, reduced hours, and automation.
Slower wage growth: Even when employment recovers, wages for low‑income workers often lag behind inflation, reducing real purchasing power.
Limited asset ownership: Lower‑income households are less likely to own stocks, real estate, or other assets that usually grow during economic recoveries, so they miss out on wealth gains.
Rising cost pressures: Increases in housing, food, healthcare, and transportation costs hit lower‑income families harder because these expenses make up a larger share of their income.
Reduced economic mobility: Gaps in savings, education access, and job training can make it harder to move into higher‑paying roles as the economy changes.

Bottom line: In a K‑shaped economy, overall growth can mask widening inequality, with lower‑income Americans experiencing prolonged financial hardship.

What the K‑Shaped Economy Means for Workers

Workers on the downward side of the K face intersecting challenges that unions confront daily:

Unequal recovery: Office‑based and managerial jobs rebounded quickly, while service, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare support, and food service jobs remain volatile despite being essential to the economy.
Falling real wages: Even where nominal wages went up, inflation—especially in housing, food, and healthcare—has eaten away at paychecks, leaving many workers worse off.
Precarious employment: More workers are employed part‑time, on temporary contracts, or misclassified as independent contractors, limiting access to benefits and job security.
Unsafe and demanding conditions: Productivity demands have gone up without corresponding improvements in safety, staffing, or compensation.
Weakened worker voice: Decades of declining union density and weak labor law enforcement have reduced workers’ ability to bargain collectively for fair wages and conditions.

A K‑shaped economy is a direct consequence of declining worker power. When workers cannot collectively negotiate, economic gains flow upward instead of being shared. Union jobs consistently deliver higher wages, safer workplaces, better benefits, and greater economic stability—making unions a key solution to K‑shaped inequality.

Since the Trump administration often blames Biden for everything, here is the reality of the many causes of the high rate of inflation resulting from Global, not exclusively domestic, conditions. Biden faced unprecedented global economic pressures requiring innovative and challenging responses. Yet his policies managed to slow and then reduce inflation from it peak of 9% to a generally accepted 3% level.

Here is a single‑row table summarizing the primary cause of inflation under Biden, as described by mainstream economic research (Fed, NBER, FactCheck): These conclusions are easily verifiable.

Inflation under Biden (2021–2022)	Primary cause
Rapid inflation surge to ~9%	Post‑COVID demand rebounded faster than supply, while supply chains were still constrained; fiscal stimulus boosted demand, and energy/food shocks from the Ukraine war pushed prices to their peak

In one sentence: Inflation was mainly caused by too much demand chasing too little supply after COVID, with stimulus and global energy shocks making it worse.

Primary cause (the core driver)

Demand rebounded faster than supply after COVID

As the economy reopened in 2021, consumer spending surged while production, labor supply, and logistics were still constrained.
Pandemic supply‑chain disruptions (ports, chips, autos, shipping) limited how fast goods and services could be produced, pushing prices higher when demand jumped.
[factually.co], [nber.org]

This demand‑supply mismatch is widely identified as the central mechanism behind the inflation takeoff.

Major amplifiers (what made it worse)

1. Large fiscal stimulus

Pandemic‑era stimulus (including the $1.9T American Rescue Plan) added significant purchasing power while the economy’s supply capacity was still impaired.
Research and fact‑checks conclude stimulus contributed meaningfully, though estimates vary on how much.
[nber.org], [politifact.com]

Most mainstream analyses say stimulus was a contributor, not the sole cause. And, with inflation now closer to the standard model, the termination of the program will eliminate necessary and long-term benefits from the program targeting infrastructure improvements, environmental progress, and adapting to a changing energy focus from fossil fuels to renewables.

2. Global energy and food shocks

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 caused sharp increases in oil, gas, and food prices, pushing inflation to its peak.
Energy prices spill into transportation, manufacturing, and groceries, affecting nearly everything.
[factually.co], [nber.org]

3. Tight labor markets

Job openings far exceeded available workers in 2021–2022.
Rising wages added cost pressure in services, contributing to “sticky” inflation later on.
[nber.org]

What it was not

Inflation was not unique to the U.S.; it surged across advanced economies after COVID.
That global pattern supports the conclusion that pandemic and energy shocks mattered greatly, not just U.S. policy.
[chicagofed.org]

One‑sentence summary

Inflation under Biden was primarily caused by a rapid post‑COVID demand rebound colliding with constrained supply, then intensified by fiscal stimulus and global energy shocks—especially the Ukraine war.

Then there’s this, from a posting by Ken Block on social media.

“Have the tariffs negatively impacted the US economy?

Yup.

A $12 billion “Farmer Bridge Assistance” program, also known as a bailout, will provide up to $155,000 to each “row crop” farm (soybean farms are the most affected).

The bailout mitigates financial losses from trade disputes and the impact of reciprocating tariffs.

Farmers are calling this aid a “drop in the bucket” and a short-term band-aid rather than a solution to their economic crisis. Farmers estimate this aid covers only about 25% of the economic harm they have endured since Trump lit up his tariff war.

Worse, China has stopped buying US soybeans altogether and has replaced our soybean exports with soybeans from other countries. There is a real risk that our soybean farmers have lost the Chinese market for good. Other countries have also replaced US exports with goods from non-US sources. Economic isolation, as well as isolation stemming from the US’s unfriendly posture toward many of the countries we trade with, means a loss of crucial markets that we may never fully regain.” Ken Block, Author of Disproven (https://kenblock.com/DISPROVEN.html)

And do yourself a favor and read Ken Block’s book, Disproven. In light of recent statements by President Trump and his administration continuing the spread of the lie that the 2020 election was stolen and rife with fraud, the threat to the free and open elections outside the control of government is an existential one.

Send in the Clowns

February 9, 2026February 9, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / 1 Comment

But where are the clowns?
Quick, send in the clowns
Don't bothеr, they're herе
Stephen Sondheim "Send in the Clowns"

I posted a photo the other day of the US Border Patrol emblem on the backs of rodeo clowns. It struck me as a bit ironic, but not remarkably significant. I meant it as no insult to Rodeo Clowns, they engage in rather challenging activities, but the irony for those of us troubled by the recent actions by Border Patrol agents was too good to pass up.

By the reaction, you would have thought I posted an AI video of a former President and First Lady depicted as apes. I expected some of the usual dribble from the Trump camp, but the reaction was more hyperbolic than expected.

Apparently the Border Patrol has been sponsors of Rodeo Clowns for some time. Now, aside wondering why the federal government is spending tax dollars on sponsoring Rodeo Clowns, I didn’t really give it much thought until the comments started to arrive.

The virulence of the reaction was truly amazing.

There was the usual “Obama did it, too. Biden did it, too.” rant. Always expected and meaningless. But then it degenerated into a full-blown diatribe on everything that is wrong with America (it’s the Democrats) and lunatic conspiracy theories of a planned open border invasion to flood the country with voters to support the Democrats.

It was head spinning, full-blown, whack-a-ding-hoy craziness without a point. Or was it?

Perhaps they see a value in putting Rodeo Clowns on the border? Some might suggest we already have one in the White House. Send in the clowns! Don’t bother, they’re here.

Now the overwhelming majority of Border Patrol agents are dedicated, conscientious, and professional. The “clowns” among them and in command are not reflective of the agency as a whole. But I would bet, if asked, they might want to see their emblem displayed on something more in keeping with their job as a law enforcement agencies.

They do not wrestle bulls for a living, but there are being tainted by the leadership bulls*&t.

My only response to this lunacy is simple.

What a bunch of clowns!

“The Inhuman Power of the Lie”*

February 8, 2026February 8, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

^*From Dr. Zhivago by Boris Pasternak

If it is not clear to everyone now that this administration, and Mr. Trump, rival the Soviet Union when it comes to prevarication and suppression of the truth as policy it never will.

What they have done is seize the “inhuman power of the lie” as so aptly put by Boris Pasternak in Dr. Zhivago (and you thought it was just a movie) and implemented it as standard practice.

Can’t answer a question by the media, attack the media.

Can’t explain a revelation or report of incompetence or wrongdoing, attack the source.

Can’t answer critics, indict them or sue them.

The list is long and I won’t bother to recite it all here. Those of you who recognize this disaster of an administration already know it and those of you who deny this reality will skip over it as per your master’s protocol (if you need to know something, he will tell you what it is.)

This political usefulness (in a Machiavellian sort of way) of lies and denial, well documented in On Lying and Politics by Hannah Arendt, while a characteristic of many political entities, has been taken to a different level with the Trump Cabal of Con Artists and Pretenders to the Throne.

Every single member of that administration suffers from nocturnal emissions dreaming about a time when they will occupy that position and bask in the same exercise of undemocratic power.

And it’s not like they concocted some secret plan to do this. Oh no, they hid it in plain sight in the pages of Project 2025. That wasn’t a policy document, it was an operational plan and it is well on its way to full implementation. I’ll post the link (again) and hope you take the time to read it. (Project 2025)

These lies are always accompanied by complaints of assaults by imaginary enemies with the parallel lie of imaginary triumphs. “Enemies are everywhere and they are jealous of our success. They hate America and want us to fail. The Constitution is not always right, we know better.”

Since the first moment he pronounced the 2020 election a fraud, a blatant lie well documented in the book Disproven by Ken Block (a must read), to the latest denial that he “didn’t read the whole post,” when he put a racist and sickening video on his Truth Social platform, which could be named Pravda but the irony might be too deep, I believe he is incapable of telling the truth. And before you scream Block is a liar and agent of the Democrats, he was hired BY THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN and last time I checked they do not hire Democratic operatives. Why would they? They don’t actually embrace democracy in either the Democrat or the once admirable GOP style.

And the frightening part, is the number of otherwise intelligent and supposedly rational individuals around him who have become card carrying members of the Hear no Evil, See no Evil, Speak no Evil club required for membership in the Trump Cult. They would’ve burned a card with a saint in their hands, but they couldn’t find any.

Let’s hope the guardrails of government can withstand this out-of-control monstrosity of an oversize load vehicle veering side to side and smashing against them.

“And this your mountainish inhumanity”

February 7, 2026February 7, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

The Strangers Case

Anyone who has not experienced the genius of Shakespeare knows not what they are missing. Here, in a speech from the unfinished play Sir Thomas More, Shakespeare again demonstrates his brilliance.

On May 1, 1517 — now referred to as Evil May Day — riots broke out in London as a response to an influx of immigrant workers. This play, written some eighty years later and attributed to Shakespeare, was never performed, likely due to censorship, yet could not be more appropriate for the age in which we find ourselves.

My point is to underscore the fact that the overwhelming majority of those who’ve entered the country unlawfully are human beings that have done nothing more than seek a better life for themselves and their families. Yes they’ve committed a crime but, given the same challenges they face in their native countries—desperation, violence, starvation, torture, death—who wouldn’t break a minor law if it saved your life or the lives of those you love?

We are using them as pawns in the game of politics and overlooking their humanity in the pursuit of justice that bears little resemblance to the ideals of American exceptionalism.

We are better than this. We can find a way to protect our borders, enforce our laws, and preserve our humanity. They are not mutually exclusive. But we need to remind ourselves what is the most important part of that. And if you don’t believe it is preserving our humanity, we are in grave trouble.

And if you want to experience the full power of this speech, search Ian McClellan’s off the cuff performance on Stephen Colbert’s show.

However you experience it you have to be touched by its powerful message.


Grant them removed, and grant that this your noise
Hath chid down all the majesty of England;
Imagine that you see the wretched strangers,
Their babies at their backs and their poor luggage,
Plodding to the ports and coasts for transportation,
And that you sit as kings in your desires,
Authority quite silent by your brawl,
And you in ruff of your opinions clothed;
What had you got? I’ll tell you: you had taught
How insolence and strong hand should prevail,
How order should be quelled; and by this pattern
Not one of you should live an agèd man,
For other ruffians, as their fancies wrought,
With self same hand, self reasons, and self right,
Would shark on you, and men like ravenous fishes
Would feed on one another.
[…]
Say now the king,
As he is clement if th’offender mourn,
Should so much come too short of your great trespass
As but to banish you, whither would you go?
What country, by the nature of your error,
Should give you harbor? Go you to France or Flanders,
To any German province, to Spain or Portugal,
Nay, anywhere that not adheres to England,
Why, you must needs be strangers: would you be pleased
To find a nation of such barbarous temper,
That, breaking out in hideous violence,
Would not afford you an abode on earth,
Whet their detested knives against your throats,
Spurn you like dogs, and like as if that God
Owed not nor made not you, nor that the elements
Were not all appropriate to your comforts,
But chartered unto them, what would you think
To be thus used? This is the strangers’ case;
And this your mountainish inhumanity.

Asleep at a Very Dangerous Switch…

February 6, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

I have finally found the most apt appellation for our sitting (dozing, catatonic, somnambulistic) President. Persistent vegetative state seemed too crude, imprecise, and insulting to those in such a condition.

I believe the President suffers from Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome.

He appears (remember how appearances deceive) to be conscious.

He utters (unintelligible) sounds.

He responds (inappropriately) to stimuli.

And his words and actions seem disconnected from reality.

His quotes seem to be fashioned by shuffling a card deck with words, tossing them randomly on a desk, then struggling to read them.

His SOCIAL MEDIA POSTINGS ARE BEYOND WORD SALAD RISING TO THE LEVEL OF AN ENTIRE SALAD BAR OF NON-SEQUITURS, NONSENSE, AND RANDOM FIRINGS OF THE SLEEPY SYNAPSES OF HIS BRAIN.

In a nutshell, the lights are on (blinking, but on) and no one is home.

Now, to save us all some time with the “yeah, but what about Biden” herd, President Biden may have been exhibiting similar symptoms toward the end of his Presidency but this President has exhibited these characteristics since the first moments he decided to run for office.

Biden may have lost a step or two, but at least he once had the dexterity to accomplish things. Trump has been tripping over his own bone spurs since his first press conference.

Just imagine what’s in our future with this zombie in the White House. A sharper, more devastating tragic comedy than anything even Shakespeare could craft.

The Fleecing of America

February 5, 2026February 5, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

“There’s a sucker born every minute.”

Over the past seventy years or so, the general American public has been the unwitting victim of, and in some cases willing participant in, the largest fraud ever perpetrated. And the truly diabolical part about it is, even when faced with the evidence of this fraud, a significant majority still applauds the scheme.

This fraud is not a sole domain of any particular party, both major parties have been participants at various times. But it is characterized by the so-called “pro-business” philosophy generally more fully embraced by the Republicans, but not exclusively.

The fraud itself is simple, as most scams are, and the evidence right in front of our eyes, but the implementation has been so smooth and subtle that even when many suffer from its effects, they are still blinded to it.

There are two fairly straightforward elements that show the results of this fraud; the ratio of executive (CEO, CFO) salaries to worker salaries and the federal minimum wage. There are corollary supporting elements, historical P/E rates and the move from productivity as a measure of business viability to profitability and shareholder returns.

But the prime examples are the earnings gap and historical minimum wage.

Year / Era	CEO‑to‑Worker Pay Ratio
1950 (est.)	~20:1
1965	21:1
1978	~30:1
1989	~58–60:1
2000	~350–380:1
2007	~325–330:1

By 2025 the ratio had risen to 350 to 1.

This rise is executive compensation and decline in worker compensation demonstrates the dramatic change in the focus from productivity to shareholder return.

Along with the decline in unions which formerly balanced the compensation picture, workers lost ground while executives gained much more.

Coupled with executives gaining more control over the board of directors (which control executive compensation) the fallacy of what’s good for business is good for America strains credulity.

EPI’s research shows CEO pay rose ~1,100% since 1978 while worker pay rose ~25%. [epi.org], [epi.org]

But the real stark evidence is in the decimation of the buying power of minimum wage.

Year	Nominal minimum wage	Real value (≈ 2024 dollars)
1950	$0.75	≈ $9.50–10.00
1960	$1.00	≈ $10.00–10.50
1968 (peak)	$1.60	≈ $13.50–14.00
1980	$3.10	≈ $11.50–12.00
1990	$3.80	≈ $8.50–9.00
2009	$7.25	≈ $10.00–10.50

Today’s minimum wage sits at $7.25 per hour, the lowest buying power since the 1950s

1950s–1960s: Minimum wage did track cost of living

Real minimum wage stayed flat or rising
A full‑time minimum‑wage job could:
- Cover basic housing
- Provide food and transportation
- Support a single adult above poverty

In 1968, the minimum wage was worth ~40–45% of the average production work

1970s–1980s: Inflation breaks the link

High inflation + infrequent adjustments
Real value falls even when nominal wage rises
Minimum wage stops keeping up with housing, healthcare, and education costs

By the early 1980s, minimum wage workers experienced double‑digit real pay cuts despite “raises.” [budget.house.gov]

1990s–2020s: Structural decoupling

Minimum wage adjustments become political, not automatic
No indexing to inflation
Real value oscillates but trends downward

By the 2020s:

Real minimum wage is ~30–40% below its 1968 peak
Covers far less than basic living costs in most U.S. regions

Minimum wage vs cost of living today

2025 reality

At $7.25/hour:

Annual full‑time earnings ≈ $15,000
Federal poverty line (single adult): ~$15,000
Median rent for a 1‑bedroom apartment: $1,200–1,600/month

In other words, the federal minimum wage no longer reflects the cost of living at all—it roughly equals poverty, not subsistence. [concordcoalition.org]

Bottom line

As a cost‑of‑living measure:

✅ 1950–1968: Worked reasonably well
⚠️ 1970s–1980s: Became unreliable
❌ 1990–2025: Failed completely

In real terms, today’s federal minimum wage buys less than it did in 1950, and far less than it did at its 1968 peak.

Decade	Statutory Federal Minimum (nominal $/hr)*	Typical real purchasing power (today’s $/hr, band)	Key context
1950s	$0.75 → $1.00	$9–$11	Post‑war floor broadly kept up with prices. [fred.stlouisfed.org], [ecommons.cornell.edu]
1960s	$1.00 → $1.60 (1968)	peaks ≈ $14–$15	Highest real value (1968). [legalclarity.org]
1970s	$1.60 → $3.10	$9–$12	Inflation erodes gains; still above 2009–2025 levels. [ecommons.cornell.edu]
1980s	$3.10 → $3.35	$7–$10	Long pauses; real value falls. [ecommons.cornell.edu]
1990s	$3.80 → $5.15	$8–$10	Two step‑ups (1990–91, 1996–97). [fred.stlouisfed.org]
2000s	$5.15 → $7.25 (2009)	~$9–$11	2007–09 hikes; then frozen. [fred.stlouisfed.org]
2010s	$7.25 (flat)	~$8–$10	Inflation steadily chips away. [statista.com]
2020s	$7.25 (flat)	~$7–$8	Lowest real value since the 1950s. [economic.github.io]

So when the political powers that be argue that minimum wage was never intended to be a living wage, you can now see the lie.

When companies strip salary and benefits from workers to pay executives whose sole purpose is to increase shareholder returns on the backs of those workers and seek to weaken or destroy unions that try to prevent such actions, you’ll see the lie.

Before anyone gets their panties in a bunch, this is not an argument for socialism. This is an argument for a return to fairness doctrine where workers at the lowest level can survive on a minimum wage and afford the necessities of life.

I have no issue with a corporation paying executives two or three hundred times the wage of their lowest workers, as long as those workers can enjoy a livable salary for their work.

This is supposed to be a land of opportunity for everyone who works hard. At a minimum, it should be fair on both ends of the spectrum.

Now What?

February 4, 2026February 4, 2026 / Joe Broadmeadow / Leave a comment

Surprise History Quiz

Okay, books away, grab a pen (actually, keyboard) and answer this question, What is the worst Holocaust in recorded history? Answer at the end of this column, but you’ll see it, or should, long before that. Okay, go.

The Latest Trumpian Idiocy: Trump administration erases Native American, slavery history from U.S. national parks

https://english.news.cn/northamerica/20260201/477bfd64d4094e3480863616cd371ed2/c.html

To the victor goes the spoils and the opportunity to write the history. This administration is on a mission to whitewash any inkling of historical facts that place the United States in a bad light.

Slavery was uncompensated skills training and religious reorientation from heathenism with room and board.

The Trail of Tears was an all-expenses-paid government relocation program offering free land and the opportunity to live in other parts of the United States. And, when the discovery of oil, uranium, and other minerals spoiled the landscape, they were moved without cost again, and again, and again.

The European conquest of the Americas was a free offering of advanced technology to backwards people.

Somehow, Mr. Trump believes that removing references to historical facts will change reality. The saddest part of this is that he may not have to. Much of the history of slavery and the treatment of Indigenous peoples by Europeans, and by Americans after the establishment of the country, is glossed over in most classrooms.

This is how people fail to learn from history.

The Answer to the Quiz

The decimation of indigenous people as a result of the arrival of Europeans to the Americas after 1492 dwarfs the deaths of the Holocaust of Nazi Germany.

While there are differences—timeframe, historical context, methodology—they all stem from the same ignorance-based prejudice against one group by another.

The genocide of Indigenous peoples in North, Central, and South America and the Holocaust of Nazi Germany were both driven by dehumanizing racial ideologies and caused immense loss of life. Still, they differed markedly in form and context. Indigenous populations in the Americas were devastated over centuries through a combination of introduced diseases, forced labor, land dispossession, cultural destruction, and recurring episodes of mass violence linked to European colonization, with responsibility spread across multiple empires and states. The Holocaust occurred over a short, defined period (1933–1945). It was a centrally planned, state-run genocide, using industrialized methods such as ghettos, deportations, and extermination camps to systematically murder Jews and other targeted groups. While both cases reflect the lethal consequences of racism and exclusion, they differ in duration, organization, methods, and contemporary documentation and postwar accountability.

It is vitally important to understand both the outcomes of these historical events and how they occurred.

Perhaps the sheer numbers may make it harder to ignore.

Nazi Holocaust

The accepted number for people killed by the Holocaust and Hitler’s final solution is 11 million. 6 million Jews, and 5 million Roma (Gypsies), disabled individuals, Polish and Soviet civilians, prisoners of war, homosexuals, and political opponents.

Slavery

When combining deaths before transport, during the Middle Passage, and under enslavement, historians often cite a total death toll of roughly 10–15 million people attributable to slavery in the Americas, with some broader estimates reaching higher when including wider African demographic losses tied to the system.

Post-Columbian Deaths of Indigenous Peoples

Most scholars today estimate that between 50 and 60 million Indigenous people lived in the Americas in 1492, and that by 1600–1650, roughly 85–90% had died as a result of European arrival. This implies about 45–55 million deaths across North, Central, and South America.

These deaths resulted primarily from introduced Old World diseases (such as smallpox, measles (wait, measles kill people?), and influenza), compounded by warfare, enslavement, forced labor, famine, displacement, and social collapse under colonial rule. While earlier estimates varied widely—from as low as 10 million to over 100 million—modern syntheses of archaeological, ecological, and documentary evidence have converged on the ~50–60 million precontact population and ~45–55 million deaths as the most defensible range.

The most dangerous killer of humans is prejudice.

Removing a few signs may eliminate obvious reminders of this tragedy, but it will not erase the reality. The United States learns from its mistakes. There are exceptions —the last Presidential election being the most glaring—but generally, we benefit from an open and frank analysis of our decisions and actions. It is what differentiates us from many other nations.

This folly of revising history isn’t new—The Civil War is known in the South as The War of Northern Aggression—but it is dangerous.

We have a friend from Germany, and we often talked about how a country as advanced, progressive, and educated as Germany descended into the horrors of Nazism. While there is no one answer, fear is a significant factor. And fear is almost exclusively a result of a lack of understanding and empathy.

I hope that, as we approach the mid-term elections and, more critically, the next Presidential election, we return to a nation that embraces empathy and intelligence over fear and ignorance.

And perhaps Columbus Day isn’t such a good idea after all.